Thursday, December 15, 2011

Eiffel Tower Goes GREEN?

Someone has a lofty horticultural vision for Paris!

It was announced recently that there are plans to cover the Eiffel Tower in 600,000 plants for 2012.  Can you imagine?  The $96 million plan is the work of Ginger (an engineering group) Vinci (a construction company) and architect Claude Bucher, who say they have built a prototype several meters high.

The plants would be attached to the tower in bags and would be irrigated by a series of watering tubes.  The plan calls to allow the plants to grow until being removed in 2016.

French newspaper Le Figaro is calling the carbon-neutral project the "lungs of Paris." Other newspapers referred to it as the "largest tree."

The City of Paris immediately denied the project will happen.  They said they get "crazy" ideas all the time.  So we won't see a "living" Eiffel Tower, but it is an interesting idea.

Check out this link to which shows examples of fantastic "living" walls and buildings.  By the way, it's a pretty cool GREEN website definitely worth a look.

If you are planning a visit to Paris, visit the official Eiffel Tower website  for hours, buying tickets ahead of time, making dinner reservations, or learning more about Paris' most famous landmark. They also have a section for kids, which for a parent is a great resource.

Here we are at the tower in 2010.  The views really are breathtaking.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Clarifying The American Clean Energy and Security Act

This post is in response to a letter written in my local paper recently, in which the writer wrongly stated that thanks to the passing of H.R. 2454 homeowners would no longer be able to sell their homes without meeting energy & water efficiency standards.  The writer must have misunderstood or not read the entire bill, because that's NOT what was approved.

As a Realtor member of the National Association of Realtors, I know that this is not true.  It may be true in other countries, as energy audits are common in some European nations, but it is not the case here.

Following is NAR's Myths and Facts about The American Clean Energy and Security Act as found on NAR's website.

NAR Myths and Facts The American Clean Energy and Security Act
National Association of REALTORS® Government Affairs Division 500 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20001

On June 26, the House of Representative approved H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act. Since then, there have been many reports about the bill and NAR's position that are based on incomplete information. Here are the facts:

Claim: “NAR supports a "Cap and Tax" bill” 

Fact: NAR takes a position on legislation, or provisions within legislation, that have a direct affect on real estate. Working with our Congressional allies, NAR stripped the Energy Bill of provisions that would have adversely affected our industry. At the direction of the NAR Board of Directors and Land Use, Property Rights and Environment Committee and the Climate Change Presidential Advisory Group, NAR concentrated on the real estate provisions in the bill. NAR was successful in getting harmful federal energy audit requirements and point-of sale triggers dropped from the bill. 

As passed, the bill:
Does not create a federal energy audit requirement for real property; 
Exempts existing homes and buildings from any federal guidelines for new construction energy labeling.
 • Leaves the decision to state government whether to pass a law and label, but specifically prohibits any
labeling during a sales transaction. 
Prohibits the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating carbon emissions from residential and
commercial buildings under the Clean Air Act; 
No longer includes provisions to bolster a private right of action under the Clean Air Act that would have
allowed citizens to halt construction over minor risks – whether real or imagined; 
Offers property owners with matching grants and diagnostic tools to make property improvements that
saves energy; and 
Provides green building financial incentives for HUD housing, including a loans, block grants and credit in
underwriting for energy improvements.

Claim: “The bill mandates energy audits and labeling before any home in America is sold.” 

Fact: The bill does not create a federal energy audit or labeling requirement. As introduced, the original bill would have required energy audits and labeling at the time of sale. However, Realtors succeeded in making many positive changes before the bill passed. Many published reports are not based on the version of the bill that was considered by the House. As approved, the bill:

Does not create energy audit requirement for real property at time of sale. 
Exempts existing homes, multifamily and commercial buildings from any federal energy labeling guidelines
such as the existing federal Energy Star label program (section 204(m)), and 
Leaves the decision entirely to state governments whether to pass a law to require labels, but expressly
prohibits labeling during a transaction (Section 204(h)).

Claim: “The bill federalizes building codes.” 

Fact: The bill would create a national building code standard that improves upon building energy efficiency. States would be given 1 year to bring their state codes into compliance with the new national standards. If a state fails to do so, the federal government would set and enforce the state’s energy codes.
Throughout the bill’s development, NAR has worked as part of a broad real estate coalition to address concerns with the House bill’s building-code provisions. NAR and the real estate coalition were unable to secure committee passage of amendments to limit these provisions. An amendment to strike the provisions defeated along a party line vote. NAR will redouble its efforts in the Senate where the energy committee has reported bipartisan alternative to the House’s that sets more realistic energy reduction targets while preserving state and local authority. If and when the Senate takes up its bill and it reaches a House-Senate conference to resolve the bill differences, we will undertake the necessary efforts and activities to ensure onerous provisions are not imposed on real estate markets.

Claim: “NAR should have read the bill.” 

Fact: NAR reviewed the entire amendment and bill before taking a position. NAR was directly involved in the development of the 308-page amendment. The energy labeling exemption for existing real property was included on page 45. The House bill is available to the public at the Library of Congress’ website: The real estate provisions are in Title 2 beginning on page 320.

Claim:  The bill contains a new federal policy that requires residential and commercial buildings to be retrofitted to federal "green" standards prior to time of sale.

Fact:   Section 202 (building retrofit program) does not contain point-of-sale retrofit requirements. 
The bill does: 
Provide states with the funding for financial incentives to property owners who voluntarily decide to make energy efficiency improvements. 
Provide that financial incentives may include grants, loans, loan guarantees, and/or mortgage interest rate buy-downs.
Establish a sliding scale for incentives -- i.e., if a home owner makes improvements that result in a 10% reduction in energy consumption, the owner would be eligible for an award of $1,000; a 20% reduction would be eligible for a $2,000 award, etc. up to a maximum award of 50% of the retrofit cost for each building.
Require state voluntary retrofit incentives programs that use federal funding for incentives to meet federal guidelines for certifying private contractor training, equipment and practices for energy audit/retrofit services eligible for federal funding.

Claim: No Congressional office will deny that there are mandatory point-of-sale retrofit requirements in the bill.

Fact: The real estate provisions in the energy bill represent approximately 50 pages of the 1428-page House bill. While members of Congress have been involved in the full range of policy issues involved in the bill, some staff may not be totally familiar with the details of the real estate related provisions. NAR has focused exclusively on these 50 pages, been involved in their drafting from the beginning, and has successfully advocated for significant improvements to these provisions. There are no federal energy audit or retrofit requirements at point of sale in the bill.

Claim: The GREEN Act provisions of the bill require owners of federally assisted housing to retrofit their building to energy efficient standards. 

Fact: The Green Act requires the HUD Secretary to establish incentives for energy efficient programs on HUD- assisted properties. The bill also provides the Secretary discretion to incorporate energy efficient standards into HUD-assisted programs.

Legislative Contacts: Austin Perez,, 202-383-1046 Helen Devlin,, 202-383-7559
Regulatory Contact: Russell Riggs,, 202-383-1259

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Little Green Things Adding Up!

Do you ever wonder if all the little things you're doing to be GREENER add up?  I know they do, but recently I've been feeling like I can actually SEE the difference, and it's pretty uplifting!

Reusable Bags was the trigger.  I've been using reusable shopping bags for a long time.  I've always liked how CVS Pharmacy rewards me for doing so through the green bag tag program.  For $1 I bought a green tag and bring my own shopping bag with me.  Each time I remember to have the cashier scan my tag adds up, and for every 4 times they give me back a $1 coupon.  I looked down at my receipt the other day to find I'd used my tag something like 44 times this year.  That was pretty nice to see that I'd saved that many plastic shopping bags AND that I'd earned $11 back for doing what I would have done anyway.  As a side note on the reusable bags, I recently organized my pantry and found I had twice as many bags as I'll ever need.  (I have some canvas bags that are 8 years old that are holding up beautifully!)  Those extras are being offered at my local senior center or to anyone else who needs them.

Our mostly-empty trash barrel makes me happy as well.  Thanks to recycling and composting, we really could use the smaller trash bin and save some more money there.  However, we let a single neighbor put her trash in our bin so she doesn't have to pay for trash removal (yes, we live in a town that does not collect our trash) so after she puts her trash in there I'm not sure we could still go with the smaller bin...but still.  We've cut way back on filling the larger barrel.

The reusable coffee filter on the Keurig Coffee Maker.

We had one when we first bought it, but it was accidentally tossed out by someone who didn't realize it was the reusable one, and I finally got around to picking up a new one.  The new one happens to be easier to use than the first one I had, and getting it on sale it ended up costing the price of a box of k-cups.  (If you are buying a reusable filter, be sure to check that it fits your model - this one does not fit all Keurigs.)   For that price I've easily gotten my money's worth already, and brewed some yummy seasonal gingerbread coffee :)  Less waste makes me smile.

Happy December 1 Everyone!  Hope you're all bringing a little more GREEN into your everyday as well as your holidays :)